1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 583 So.2d
  5. 583 So.2d 819 (1991)
 

MODE, INC. v. HARDRIVES COMPANY

Nos. 89-2956, 90-2510.

583 So.2d 819 (1991)

MODE, INC., and Regency Insurance Company, Appellants, v. HARDRIVES COMPANY, Appellee. HARDRIVES COMPANY, Appellant, v. MODE, INC., and Regency Insurance Company, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

August 21, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davis W. Duke, Jr., and Bryan Duke of Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants/appellees-Mode, Inc., and Regency Ins. Co.

Steve Chackman, Rob Buchsbaum, and Neil Rose of Conroy, Simberg & Lewis, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee/appellant-Hardrives Co.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and orders on appeal except the determination as to interest.

Because competent substantial evidence exists to support the judgment entered below, we find no error in the trial court's refusal to grant a new trial to Mode, Inc. We also find no error in the admission of evidence at trial.

As to the post-verdict proceedings, we affirm the determination of attorney's fees but reverse the determination as to prejudgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases