TEE v. ALBERTSON'S, INC.

88-11538; CA A64558.

813 P.2d 574 (1991)

107 Or.App. 638

In the matter of the Compensation of Betty S. TEE, Claimant. Betty S. Tee, Petitioner, v. ALBERTSONS, Inc., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 19, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phil Goldsmith, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Robert K. Udziela, Stephen V. Piucci, and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy, Portland.

Thomas M. Christ, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Mitchell, Lang & Smith, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Claimant seeks review of a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board reversing the referee's order and holding that she is not permanently and totally disabled as a result of her compensable low back and leg injury and chronic pain syndrome.

The Board's findings are supported by substantial evidence on the whole record. Before her low back injury in 1984, claimant worked for employer as a meat wrapper; she has not worked since 1985...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases