1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 233 Cal.App.3d
  5. 233 Cal.App.3d 1143 (1991)
 

MANN v. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

Docket No. B051750.

233 Cal.App.3d 1143 (1991)

285 Cal. Rptr. 9

HOWARD MANN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE et al., Defendants and Respondents; CLOVERLEAF SOUTH BAY, LTD., Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

August 29, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Thomas F. Winfield III and Katharine A. Miller for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Adams, Duque & Hazeltine, Michael Adamson, Richard R. Terzian and Lynne K. Dombrowski for Defendants and Respondents.

Greenberg, Glusker, Fields, Claman & Machtinger and Garrett L. Hanken for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

GOERTZEN, J.

Petitioners/appellants Howard Mann, Eugene Rosenfeld, and the Andrex Group (collectively as appellants) appeal from the judgment denying their petition for a writ of mandate. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085.) Appellants had petitioned to require respondents the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Hawthorne (Agency) and the City of Hawthorne (City) to set...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases