OREGONIANS IN ACTION v. LCDC

LCDC 90-CERT-659; CA A66688.

814 P.2d 561 (1991)

108 Or.App. 307

OREGONIANS IN ACTION, Petitioner, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, (Fish and Wildlife), Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 31, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Smith, Tigard, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

John T. Bagg, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LCDC's order certifying the State Agency Coordination Program of the Department of Fish and Wildlife (department). ORS 197.180; OAR 660, Divisions 30 and 31.1 Petitioner's sole assignment is that LCDC erred by not requiring the department's Land Use Planning Guide (guide) to be included in the program and subject to certification. As the department argues — and as the guide's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases