HOOD v. AMARILLO NAT. BANK

No. D-0980.

815 S.W.2d 545 (1991)

Thomas H. HOOD, et al., Petitioners, v. AMARILLO NATIONAL BANK, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Texas.

September 18, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles A. Stephens, II, Canyon Lake, Michael S. Smiley, Amarillo, for petitioners.

Laurance Alan Bransgrove, Tom Boyd, Amarillo, for respondents.


ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In this cause, we consider whether a final and appealable judgment existed after one defendant filed bankruptcy prior to the trial court's entry of judgment and there was no severance of the bankrupt defendant. Under these circumstances, we conclude that there was no final and appealable judgment. Pursuant to Rule 170 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, a majority of the court grants the motion for rehearing of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases