1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 229 Cal.App.3d
  5. 229 Cal.App.3d 1130 (1991)
 

BOTELLO v. SHELL OIL CO.

Docket No. B048734.

229 Cal.App.3d 1130 (1991)

280 Cal. Rptr. 535

DAVID BOTELLO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

May 1, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Folger & Levin, Thomas P. Laffey, Cristeta S. Paguirigan and Amy L. Neiman for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Sherry A. Aarons for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

EPSTEIN, J.

(1a) In this case we are asked to decide a single issue of statutory interpretation: whether a mural is a "painting" within the meaning of The California Art Preservation Act (Act). (Civ. Code, § 987.)1 We hold that it is.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This case reaches us after the trial court granted defendants' motion for full summary judgment based on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases