BARKER v. BATES

No. RC 90-68.

803 S.W.2d 554 (1991)

304 Ark. 584

Joe A. BARKER, and Leo E. Barker, Petitioners, v. Albert E. BATES and Shirley Bates, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

February 18, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Lewis Steenken, Fayetteville, for petitioners.

Ralph C. Williams, Bentonville, for respondents.


PER CURIAM.

In this civil case, we denied the petitioners' motion for rule on the clerk to lodge the transcript because the attempt to lodge it with this Court was untimely. The petitioners ask that we reconsider our ruling, stating that we "routinely grant a rule on the clerk when counsel freely admits his negligence in tendering the record on appeal in ... [an untimely] manner." The case cited in support of that statement is Shuffield v. State,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases