OPINION
FARRIS, Justice.
The appellants sued the appellees for damages alleging the appellees fraudulently misrepresented the value of a motel which appellees sold appellants. Appellees cross-claimed for the unpaid balance of the note appellants executed in consideration for the sale of the motel. Following a bench trial, the court entered judgment denying appellants recovery but awarding damages to appellees on their cross-action. In three points, appellants...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.