1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 756 F.Supp.
  5. 756 F.Supp. 589 (1991)
 

WHITTLE v. MOSCHELLA

Civ. A. No. 90-550 (CRR).

756 F.Supp. 589 (1991)

Hiriam T. WHITTLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Emil P. MOSCHELLA, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 31, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarence F. Stanback, Jr., Arlington, Va., for plaintiff.

Hiriam T. Whittle, Baltimore, Md., pro se.

Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty. for the District of Columbia, John D. Bates and Thomas S. Rees, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., for defendants.

OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

The pro se plaintiff1 filed the above-captioned suit based on his claims that the defendants Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI"), FBI employee Emil P. Moschella, FBI Director William Sessions, Attorney General Richard L. Thornburgh and the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") have failed to comply with his requests for records pursuant to the Freedom of Information...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases