JACKSON v. HOYLMAN

No. 90-3053.

933 F.2d 401 (1991)

Ernest JACKSON, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond HOYLMAN and Robert Bidwell, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided May 22, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George C. Rogers (argued), Rogers & Godbey, Toledo, Ohio, for Ernest Jackson, Sr.

Thomas A. Karol, Asst. U.S. Atty., Western Div., Toledo, Ohio, for Raymond Hoylman, U.S. Marshal.

Thomas A. Karol, Asst. U.S. Atty., Lori M. Beranek (argued), Barbara C. Biddle, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Appellate Staff, Civ. Div., Washington, D.C., for Robert Bidwell, U.S. Marshal.

Before MARTIN, RYAN, and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges.


RYAN, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Hoylman and Bidwell appeal the denial of their summary judgment motion based on qualified immunity in this Bivens-type action. See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). The question before us is whether the district court err in denying the defendants' claim of qualified immunity. We conclude that because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases