Karl L. OBERG, Respondent,
v.
HONDA MOTOR CO., Ltd.; Honda R & D Co., Ltd; and American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Appellants.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted April 22, 1991.
Decided June 26, 1991.
Reconsideration Denied September 25, 1991.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Jeffrey R. Brooke, Phoenix, Ariz., argued the cause, for appellants. With him on the briefs, were Paul G. Cereghini and Bowman and Brooke, Phoenix, Ariz., and James H. Gidley, Thomas W. Brown and Cosgrave, Vergeer & Kester, Portland.
William A. Gaylord, Portland, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief, were Richard O. Thomas and Gaylord, Thomas & Eyerman, P.C., and Raymond F. Thomas and Royce, Swanson & Thomas, Portland.
Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
EDMONDS, Judge.
Defendants1 appeal a judgment in favor of plaintiff in this product liability case. They make multiple assignments of error. We affirm.
At trial, plaintiff offered evidence that he was injured while riding a three-wheeled 1985 model Honda ATC 350X all-terrain vehicle (ATV) that was manufactured and sold by defendants.2 While his two brothers...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.