1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 474 N.W.2d
  5. 474 N.W.2d 835 (1991)
 

UNITED SHIPPING CO. v. TUCKER CO.

Nos. C2-91-402, C5-91-457.

474 N.W.2d 835 (1991)

The BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF UNITED SHIPPING COMPANY, INC., Appellant, (C2-91-402) v. TUCKER COMPANY, Respondent. (C2-91-402). UNITED SHIPPING COMPANY, INC., Appellant, (C5-91-457) v. NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE & RUBBER MARKETING, INC. d/b/a N.A.R.M. Transportation Brokerage, Respondent. (C5-91-457).

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied October 31, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Wolff, Snelling Christensen & Briant, P.A., Minneapolis, for United Shipping Co., Inc.

Barbara R. Kueppers, Minneapolis, for Tucker Co.

Forrest M. Anderson, Harper & Anderson, Chtd., Cottage Grove, for Nat. Automotive & Rubber Marketing, Inc.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and NORTON and SHORT, JJ.

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

On appeal from separate grants of summary judgment, United Shipping Company, Inc. (U.S.C.) argues the trial court erred in (1) concluding it had a contract carrier relationship with Tucker Company; and (2) holding neither Tucker nor National Automotive & Rubber Marketing, Inc. (N.A.R.M.) were responsible for freight undercharges because both companies were transportation brokers; and (3) failing to hold both brokers have waived...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases