Granted. The warrantless seizure for forfeiture under non-exigent circumstances of the applicant's land, residence, and business was unreasonable as a matter of La.R.S. 40:2606(B), and may have violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in the absence of notice and an opportunity to be heard. See United States v. Premises and Real Property at 4492 South Livonia Road,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
