ORR, Judge.
Defendant assigns two errors on appeal. For the following reasons, we find that the trial court did not err and therefore, affirm its judgment of 29 March 1990.
Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the issue of contributory negligence. We disagree.
It it well established law in this state that if different inferences may reasonably be drawn from the evidence concerning the issue of contributory...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
