1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 943 F.2d
  5. 943 F.2d 335 (1991)
 

U.S. v. TABOR COURT REALTY CORP.

No. 90-5802.

943 F.2d 335 (1991)

UNITED STATES of America v. TABOR COURT REALTY CORP.; Raymond Colliery Co., Inc.; McClellan Realty Co., Inc.; Lackawanna County; Pagnotti Enterprises, Inc.; Loree Associates; James J. Tedesco; Henry Ventre; Louis Pagnotti, II; Blue Coal Company; Gillen Coal Mining Co.; Carbondale Coal Co.; Moffat Premium Anthracite; Northwest Mining, Inc.; Maple City Coal Co.; Powderly Corporation; Clinton Fuel Sales, Inc.; Great American Coal Co.; Joseph Solfanelli, individually and as trustee; General Electric Credit Corp.; Comm. of Pa, Dept. of Mines & Mineral Industries, Dept. of Environmental Resources and Dept. of Revenue; Borough of Olyphant; John J. Gillen; Thomas J. Gillen; Robert W. Cleveland & Sons, Inc.; William T. Kirchoff; Jay W. Cleveland; Royal E. Cleveland; City of Scranton Sewer Authority; Lackawanna River Gleneagles Investment Co., Inc.; Jeddo Highland Coal Co.; Olyphant Premium Anthracite, Inc.; Olyphant Associates; Minindu Corporation; Glen Nan, Inc.; Gilco, Inc.; Jay W. Cleveland, As Administrator of the Estate of Royal E. Cleveland. Carrier Coal Enterprises ("Carrier"), Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided September 5, 1991.

As Amended September 10, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John G. Whelley, Jr. (argued), Francis G. Wenzel, Jr., Joseph G. Ferguson, Rosenn, Jenkins & Greenwald, Wilkes-Barre, Pa., for appellant Carrier Coal Enterprises.

Thomas I. Vanaskie (argued), Thomas D. Brown, Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish & Kauffman, Scranton, Pa., George A. Spohrer, Hourigan, Kluger, Spohrer & Quinn, P.C., Wilkes-Barre, Pa., for appellee Scott F. Linde.

Thomas P. Brennan, Gallagher, Brennan & Gill, Wilkes-Barre, Pa., for appellee Thomas H. Kiley, Receiver for Raymond Colliery Co., Inc.

Before BECKER, NYGAARD and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the denial of Appellant's motion for an order directing a court-appointed Receiver to convey property pursuant to an assignment of an Agreement of Sale. Subject matter jurisdiction in the district court was based on 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 26 U.S.C. § 7402(a). This court has appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

I.

This dispute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases