PHILLIPS, Judge.
Plaintiff concedes that nothing else appearing our law does not now require parents to support their disabled children after they are of age. Her contention is that the order requiring defendant to support the child was erroneously vacated because by the consent judgment he had contracted to continue supporting the child and that under Layton v. Layton,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.