1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 232 Cal.App.3d
  5. 232 Cal.App.3d 1038 (1991)
 

INDUSTRIAL RISK INSURERS v. RUST ENGINEERING CO.

Docket No. A051674.

232 Cal.App.3d 1038 (1991)

283 Cal. Rptr. 873

INDUSTRIAL RISK INSURERS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE RUST ENGINEERING COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

July 29, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, Andrew W. Horstman, William P. Linhoff, Jr., and Frank S. Towner for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Cooper, White & Cooper, John P. Makin, Patricia A. Perkins and Anthony W. Hawthorne for Defendant and Respondent.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

OPINION

PERLEY, J.

In this case we hold that the 10-year time limit Code of Civil Procedure section 337.15 places on suits for latent defects in improvements to real property commences when the defendant's work on the improvement is substantially completed, rather than when the improvement itself is substantially completed. The trial court here granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases