IN MATTER OF RICKMAN

89-25573; CA A68991.

821 P.2d 438 (1991)

110 Or.App. 126

In the Matter of the Compensation of Darrel K. RICKMAN, Claimant. Darrel K. RICKMAN, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Suregro, Inc., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 4, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles D. Maier and Gatti, Gatti, Maier & Associates, Salem, filed the brief, for petitioner.

Thomas E. Ewing, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondents.

With him on the brief, were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board denying him a penalty and attorney fees for SAIF's alleged unreasonable denial of his claim for "future" medical benefits. Even if the denial was unreasonable, there is no amount due against which a penalty could be assessed. However, we remand the case to the Board for an award of attorney fees under ORS 656.386(1) for SAIF's withdrawal of its denial after claimant's request for hearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases