FRASURE v. UNION PACIFIC R. CO.

No. CV 91-560 CBM (Ex).

782 F.Supp. 477 (1991)

Eugene FRASURE, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

November 1, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence P. Riff, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant.

Anthony S. Petru, Oakland, Cal., for plaintiff.


FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

CONSUELO BLAND MARSHALL, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant Union Pacific Railroad, Company ("UP") for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. At the September 16, 1991 hearing, the Court granted defendant's motion and hereby issues the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. UP is a corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases