1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 235 Cal.App.3d
  5. 235 Cal.App.3d 1016 (1991)
 

RICE v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC.

Docket Nos. A051808, A052638.

235 Cal.App.3d 1016 (1991)

1 Cal. Rptr.2d 265

MARYLYN S. RICE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants; RONALD REINHOLD, Defendant and Respondent. RONALD REINHOLD, Cross-complainant and Respondent, v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., et al., Cross-defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

October 31, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Eric G. Wallis, James C. Martin and Paul D. Fogel for Defendants and Appellants and Cross-defendants and Appellants.

Merrill & Arnone, William J. Arnone, Jr., Ross B. Jones and William S. Snell for Plaintiff and Respondent, Defendant and Respondent and Cross-complainant and Respondent.

OPINION

WHITE, P.J.

Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (Dean Witter), and James Sherbourne1 appeal after the trial court denied their petition to compel arbitration in a dispute arising out of a brokerage agreement. The trial court denied arbitration because the plaintiff, Marylyn S. Rice, alleged in her complaint that Dean Witter and a codefendant, Ronald Reinhold, had obtained the brokerage agreement by fraud...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases