STATE v. HARLESS

89CR1525; CA A63026.

812 P.2d 438 (1991)

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Randall Leroy HARLESS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 5, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kent W. Day, North Bend, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Janet A. Klapstein, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Marianne Ghim, Certified Law Student, Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4)(c),1 asserting that his waiver of the right to counsel was not knowingly and intelligently made. We reverse.

Defendant was arraigned on a charge of first degree theft, ORS 164.005, on the morning of July 14, 1989.2 He admits that he voluntarily waived his right to counsel at that hearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases