HARRIS v. PROCTER & GAMBLE MFG. CO.

No. 9018SC840.

401 S.E.2d 849 (1991)

Basil S. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. The PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 19, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Romallus O. Murphy, Greensboro, for plaintiff, appellant.

Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore by Martin N. Erwin and Michael A. Gilles, Greensboro, for defendant, appellee.


HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff's sole argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff argues the evidence shows that a genuine issue of material fact existed and therefore, defendant is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We disagree.

Plaintiff concedes that defendant was entitled to a qualified privilege concerning the communication that plaintiff had been discharged. However, plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases