INVESTMENT CO. INSTITUTE v. HATCH

No. C4-91-904.

477 N.W.2d 747 (1991)

INVESTMENT COMPANY INSTITUTE, Appellant, v. Michael HATCH in his capacity as Commissioner of Commerce, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 26, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. French, Elizabeth L. Taylor, Faegre & Benson, Minneapolis, Harvey L. Pitt, James H. Schropp, John F. Coverdale, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, Washington, D.C., (Matthew P. Fink, Lawrence A. Rogers, Patricia Louie, Investment Co. Institute, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Deborah J. Kohler, Spec. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for Respondents.

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, P.J., and CRIPPEN, and LOMMEN, JJ.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant contends that the statutory registration fee scheme embodied in Minn. Stat. § 80A.28, subd. 1(b) (1990) violates both the due process and the equal protection clauses of the United States Constitution. We affirm the trial court's summary judgment that the statutory language and legislative history sufficiently support the use of Minn.Stat. § 80A.28, subd. 1(b) to raise revenues.

FACTS

Subdivision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases