1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 174 A.D.2d
  5. 174 A.D.2d 1046 (1991)
 

COONEY v. OSGOOD MACH., INC.

174 A.D.2d 1046 (1991)

Dennis J. Cooney, Respondent, v. Osgood Machinery, Inc., Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Hill Acme Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; Paul Mueller Company et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

June 7, 1991

Order affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

We conclude that this case is not appropriate for summary disposition. It should be determined on a full record.

Pine, J. (dissenting).

I must dissent in part. The majority fails to specify whether in its view the moving party failed to meet its initial burden to establish its entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law or whether in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases