MILLER v. HILMAN KELLY CO.


177 A.D.2d 1036 (1991)

Michael J. Miller, Appellant, v. Hilman Kelly Company and/or its Successor in Interest, Bassh & Ross, a Division of Martin Decker Company, a Division of Cooper Industries, et al., Defendants, and Varco B.J. Oil Tools, as Successor in Interest to B.J. Machinery, Respondent. (Appeal No. 1.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

November 15, 1991


Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated.

Memorandum:

Defendants' notices to admit were palpably improper. Defendants did not seek admissions with respect to "`clear-cut matters of fact'" about which they reasonably believed there could be no dispute or controversy (Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3123:1, at 710...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases