PEOPLE v. INGRAM


171 A.D.2d 1042 (1991)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Daniel Ingram, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

March 8, 1991


Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

We reject defendant's contention that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that a particular witness was an accomplice as a matter of law. "[A]bsent proof that a person guilty of criminally receiving stolen property aided the thief in the commission of the larceny, the receiver is not an accomplice of the thief (People v Brooks,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases