1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 810 P.2d
  5. 810 P.2d 384 (1991)
 

FABER v. ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT CO.

16-88-10307, CA A63604.

810 P.2d 384 (1991)

106 Or.App. 601

Stanley FABER & Ilene Faber, Dba Arbor Lane Nursery, Respondents, v. ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT CO., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 17, 1991.

Reconsideration Denied June 12, 1991,

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Flinn, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were John R. Osburn and William E. Flinn Associates, Eugene.

George W. Kelly, Eugene, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was C. Peter Sorenson, Eugene.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs operate a tree nursery. Defendant is in the business of applying herbicides along railroad rights-of-way under contracts with railroad companies. On two occasions in 1987 and on two occasions in 1988, defendant applied herbicides to a right-of-way immediately adjacent to plaintiffs' facility, and extensive damage to plaintiffs' tree crops allegedly resulted. Plaintiffs brought this action, alleging claims, inter alia,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases