Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum:
We affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum decision of the Judicial Hearing Officer (Moule, J.H.O.). We add only that plaintiffs erroneously rely on certain Court of Appeals cases in support of their argument that the Statute of Limitations began to run upon the last date of exposure (see, Matter of Steinhardt v Johns-Manville Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.