STATE v. HEUCK

No. 82A01-9103-CR-72.

577 N.E.2d 608 (1991)

STATE of Indiana, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Gordon N. HEUCK, Appellee-Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District.

Rehearing Denied October 9, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Michael Gene Worden, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, Stanley M. Levco, Pros. Atty., Vanderburgh County, Jonathan J. Parkhurst, Deputy Pros. Atty., Evansville, for appellant-plaintiff.

Stuart Bench, Bench Law Office, Indianapolis, for appellee-defendant.


RATLIFF, Chief Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The State filed this appeal from the grant of Gordon N. Heuck's motion to suppress evidence which effectively precluded further prosecution. We reverse and remand.

ISSUE

We rephrase the sole issue on appeal as: Did the trial court err in granting Heuck's motion to suppress evidence finding that the police officer's stop was a "pretext" to search for evidence of other crimes?

FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases