HALSELL v. DEHOYOS

No. D-0996.

810 S.W.2d 371 (1991)

Jim B. HALSELL, Petitioner, v. George and Esther DEHOYOS, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 5, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig L. Austin, Jim B. Halsell, San Antonio, for petitioner.

Evelyn M. Martinez, San Antonio, for respondents.


PER CURIAM.

In this cause, we consider whether the continuance of a trial setting affects the timeliness of a jury request. The court of appeals held that it does not, and therefore upheld the trial court's denial of Petitioner's jury request. We disagree, and therefore reverse.

Esther and George Dehoyos brought this suit against Jim B. Halsell for wrongful eviction and conversion. On the Dehoyoses' motion, the trial court set the case on the non-jury docket...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases