1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 231 Cal.App.3d
  5. 231 Cal.App.3d 943 (1991)
 

RETTNER v. SHEPHERD

Docket No. H004926.

231 Cal.App.3d 943 (1991)

282 Cal. Rptr. 687

BERT RETTNER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FRANK SHEPHERD et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

June 26, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Charles F. Oakley for Defendants and Appellants.

Popelka, Allard, McCowan & Jones and Marc L. Shea for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

COTTLE, J.

Defendants appeal, inter alia, from a postjudgment order establishing the sum owing on an existing judgment as $258,990.47. They claim the judgment has been satisfied in full and, in any event, plaintiff is barred by the one form of action rule (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 725a, 726)1 and the antideficiency statutes (§§ 580a, 580d) from further collection efforts. We agree...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases