1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 951 F.2d
  5. 951 F.2d 204 (1991)
 

IN RE BUCKNUM

No. 90-55178.

951 F.2d 204 (1991)

In re Daniel R. BUCKNUM, dba Bucknum, Levine & Smith, Debtor. Joe W. MOODY, Bernice H. Moody, Appellants, v. Daniel R. BUCKNUM, dba Bucknum, Levine & Smith, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided December 9, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Meredith Bradford, Walnut Creek, Cal., for appellants.

R. Gibson Pagter, Jr., Pagter Law Corp., Santa Ana, Cal., for appellee.

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, O'SCANNLAIN and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The question before us is whether the Moodys, who are a properly scheduled judicial lienholder in this Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding, received notice of the filing deadline for a nondischargeability complaint sufficient to put them at risk for failing to meet that deadline. The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ("BAP") affirmed the bankruptcy court's dismissal of the Moodys' complaint on grounds that it was not timely filed. See In re Bucknum,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases