1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 926 F.2d
  5. 926 F.2d 227 (1991)
 

U.S. v. TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORP.

No. 699, Docket 90-1501.

926 F.2d 227 (1991)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided February 25, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. McDaniels (Steven R. Kuney, Kathleen L. Beggs, Williams & Connolly, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

John P. Fonte (James F. Rill, Asst. Atty. Gen., Michael Boudin, Deputy Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert B. Nicholson, Bernard M. Hollander, James J. Tierney, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KAUFMAN, NEWMAN, and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges.

JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:

When this case was before us on a prior appeal, we ruled that a criminal contempt fine could not be imposed in an amount greater than $100,000 in the absence of a jury trial. See United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 882 F.2d 656 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S.Ct. 722, 107 L.Ed.2d 741 (1990). Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation ("Fox") now brings a second...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases