PEOPLE v. HATZIPAVLOU


175 A.D.2d 969 (1991)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nicholas Hatzipavlou, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

August 29, 1991


Initially, we note that defendant's challenge to the adequacy of his court-appointed interpreter was not preserved for review insofar as he failed to object or express any dissatisfaction at trial (see, People v Duenas, 120 A.D.2d 978). In any event, there is nothing in the record to indicate that the interpreter was unable to, or that he failed to, properly translate for defendant (see, supra). Defendant's contention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases