MARTA v. KUCERA

S90A1296, S90A1297.

260 Ga. 882 (1991)

400 S.E.2d 314

MARTA v. KUCERA et al. SCHWAB v. KUCERA et al.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Reconsideration Denied March 1, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pursley, Howell, Lowery & Meeks, Charles N. Pursley, Jr., for appellant (case no. S90A1296).

Hurt, Richardson, Garner, Todd & Cadenhead, Henry D. Fellows, Jr., Thomas O. Davis, for appellant (case no. S90A1297).

Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Johnson & Williams, George L. Murphy, Jr., Richard N. Hubert, for appellees.


FLETCHER, Justice.

In 1971 the citizens of DeKalb County approved a referendum for the east line of the MARTA rail system through Decatur. Because the line was to run parallel to Sycamore Street, an area eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places, MARTA was required to study proposals to minimize the impact of the rail line in this area in order to be eligible for federal funding. The results of these studies were the "§ 4 (f)" Statement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases