Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant urges on appeal that reversible error was committed when the court failed to charge robbery in the third degree and petit larceny as lesser included offenses of robbery in the first degree. However, as there was no request to charge either robbery in the third degree or petit larceny and no exception was taken to the charge, the defendant's contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
