Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the hearing court did not err in denying that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress the statements made by him to law enforcement authorities on the basis that the testimony of the defendant's arresting officer was insufficient as a matter of law to establish the voluntariness of those statements. It is well settled that in reviewing suppression issues, great weight must be...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.