PEOPLE v. SOMERS


78 N.Y.2d 1058 (1991)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Raymond J. Somers, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 22, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph J. Balok, Jr., Public Defender (John R. McGlenn of counsel), for appellant.

James T. Hayden, District Attorney, for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and BELLACOSA. Judge HANCOCK, JR., dissents and votes to reverse, concluding that defendant preserved the constitutional issue whether the application of Penal Law §§ 40.15 and 25.00 unconstitutionally shifted the burden of proof to defendant, and that the trial court's charge to the jury failed to safeguard against the insanity affirmative defense statute impermissibly shifting to defendant the burden of disproving intent (see, People v Kohl, , 198-199).


Order affirmed. The issues sought to be raised by defendant are not preserved for this Court's review and, therefore, the Court cannot consider...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases