ROVIRA v. AT & T

No. 90 Civ. 5486 (RPP).

760 F.Supp. 376 (1991)

Sandra ROVIRA, individually and as executor of the Estate of Marjorie Forlini, Frank Morales and Alfred Morales, Plaintiffs, v. AT & T, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 29, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beldock, Levine & Hoffman, by Lee F. Bantle, Lambda Legal Defense & Educ. Fund, Paula Ettelbrick, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Townley & Updike, by Daniel Rizzi, New York City, for defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.

Defendant AT & T moves pursuant to Rules 12(b) and (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the local law, state law and common law claims in Counts IV, V and VI of the complaint, which allege discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and marital status and breach of contract, on the grounds that those claims are preempted by ERISA and that plaintiffs lack standing to assert...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases