1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 763 F.Supp.
  5. 763 F.Supp. 366 (1991)
 

SIDLEY & AUSTIN v. HILL

No. 90 C 07261.

763 F.Supp. 366 (1991)

SIDLEY & AUSTIN, a partnership, Plaintiff, v. Thomas W. HILL, Jr., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

April 23, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan P. Eimer, Andrew George Klevorn, Sidley & Austin, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Thomas W. Hill, Jr., pro se.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Defendant Thomas W. Hill, Jr. has moved to dismiss plaintiff Sidley & Austin's complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction.1 The complaint seeks a declaratory judgment that Sidley & Austin properly discharged all of its obligations under a consulting agreement it entered into with Hill, that the agreement constituted a valid, enforceable contract, and that it has no...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases