1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 816 P.2d
  5. 816 P.2d 306 (1991)
 

DOE v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU

No. 14568.

816 P.2d 306 (1991)

John DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, Defendant-Appellee.

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii.

August 12, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack F. Schweigert, (Jeff L. Hossellman with him on the briefs), Honolulu, for plaintiff-appellant.

Jonathan Chun, (Cheryl K. Okuma-Sepe, with him on the briefs), Deputies Corporation Counsel, Honolulu, for defendant-appellee.

Before BURNS, C.J., and HEEN, J., and Circuit Judge HUDDY, assigned by reason of vacancy.

PER CURIAM.

In McCloskey v. Honolulu Police Department, 71 Haw. 568, 799 P.2d 953 (1990), the supreme court determined that the Honolulu Police Department's (HPD) urinalysis drug testing program did not violate the right to privacy and unreasonable search provisions of the Hawaii Constitution. This case requires this court to decide whether the Honolulu Fire Department's (HFD) drug screening program by urine testing violates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases