1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 1 Cal.App.4th
  5. 1 Cal.App.4th 10 (1991)
 

HOFFMAN-HAAG v. TRANSAMERICA INS. CO.

Docket No. D012785.

1 Cal.App.4th 10 (1991)

1 Cal. Rptr.2d 805

BARBARA HOFFMAN-HAAG et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

November 21, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

McInnis, Fitzgerald, Rees, Sharkey & McIntyre, Timothy S. Thomas and Anna A. Frustaglio for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Neil, Dymott, Perkins, Brown & Frank and James A. McFall for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BENKE, J.

In this case appellants Barbara Hoffman-Haag and John Haag argue that neither a motion for new trial under Code of Civil Procedure1 section 657 nor a motion to vacate under section 663 may be based on a previously unasserted rule of law. In the particular circumstances presented here we reject their contention and affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases