Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
We reject defendant's contention that the evidence of monetary value of the damage to the property was insufficient to sustain the conviction for criminal mischief in the third degree. "In order to support a conviction for third degree criminal mischief, `it is sufficient to define value in terms of the cost of repair to the property, so long as the property is repairable' (People v Simpson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.