512 E 11TH ST HDFC v. GRIMMET


148 Misc.2d 971 (1991)

512 East 11th Street HDFC, Appellant, v. Carl Grimmet, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

January 2, 1991


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark S. Friedlander for appellant. Karen Takach for respondent.

SANDIFER, J. P., MILLER and McCOOE, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

Order entered August 23, 1989 reversed, with $10 costs, respondent's motion to dismiss denied.

Civil Court granted respondent's motion to dismiss this holdover summary proceeding on the ground that respondent is a rent-stabilized tenant and that the petition, alleging exemption from rent regulation, fails to set forth the reasons for the eviction as required by the Rent Stabilization Law. However, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases