PRAHMCOLL PROPERTIES v. SANFORD

No. CX-91-342.

474 N.W.2d 639 (1991)

PRAHMCOLL PROPERTIES, Respondent, v. T. Denny SANFORD, Appellant, Whitfield Corporation, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 27, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phillip R. Krass, Krass & Monroe Chartered, Bloomington, for respondent.

Sidney P. Abrahmson, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi and Kathleen L. Kuehl, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Thornton Anderson, Edina, for defendant.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and HUSPENI and THOREEN, JJ.


OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Sanford appeals from a judgment in favor of respondent vendor for the outstanding balance due on a contract for deed. The trial court held that appellant, as assignee, assumed the obligations of Whitfield Corporation, the assignor and original vendee. Sanford contends the trial court drew erroneous conclusions of law from the facts. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

On September 12, 1986, respondent Prahmcoll Properties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases