1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 756 F.Supp.
  5. 756 F.Supp. 353 (1991)
 

DOE v. ROE

No. 90 C 5717.

756 F.Supp. 353 (1991)

Jane DOE, Plaintiff, v. John ROE and Roe and Roe, Ltd., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

January 7, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Elson, Northwestern University Legal Clinic, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Edward J. Rolwes, Thomas P. McGarry, and Caroline A. Mondschean, Hinshaw, Culbertson, Moelmann, Hoban & Fuller, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HART, District Judge.

Presently pending is defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On such a motion, all the well-pleaded allegations of the complaint are assumed to be true and all reasonable inferences from the facts alleged are drawn in favor of plaintiff. Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education, 811 F.2d 1030, 1039 (7th...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases