IN RE MAGAR

OSB 88-5, 88-81, 89-5; SC 29172.

817 P.2d 289 (1991)

312 Or. 139

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of MAGAR E. Magar, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided September 19, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony W. Furniss, Portland, argued the cause for accused. Accused filed the opening brief pro se; with him on the reply brief was Anthony W. Furniss.

Martha Hicks, Asst. Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the brief for the Oregon State Bar.


PER CURIAM.

In this lawyer discipline case, the accused challenges only the sanction imposed on him by a trial panel for violation of the disciplinary rules. We agree with, and therefore sustain, the sanction imposed by the trial panel.1

The facts concerning the relevant cause of complaint are agreed, and may be stated briefly: The accused purchased an apartment complex in Kelso, Washington, from the Millers on a land sale contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases