1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 817 P.2d
  5. 817 P.2d 287 (1991)
 

DIKA v. DEPT. OF INS. AND FINANCE

DIF WCD 1-1990; CA A64719; SC S37964.

817 P.2d 287 (1991)

312 Or. 106

Dee DIKA, Dba Northwest Record Service, and Oregon Medical Records Association, Petitioners On Review, v. DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCE, Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided September 19, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Brown of Enfield, Guimond & Brown, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review Oregon Medical Records Ass'n.

John T. Bagg, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the response to the petition were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

FADELEY, Justice.

The issue in this administrative law case is whether respondent Department of Insurance and Finance complied with a statute requiring that a fiscal impact statement, containing information described in the statute, be included in a government agency's notice of proposed rulemaking. ORS 183.335 in part provides:

"(1) Prior to the adoption, amendment or repeal of any rule, the agency shall give notice of its intended action: "* ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases