1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 228 Cal.App.3d
  5. 228 Cal.App.3d 871 (1991)
 

KAZEROUNI v. DE SATNICK

Docket No. B046018.

228 Cal.App.3d 871 (1991)

279 Cal. Rptr. 74

AKBAR KAZEROUNI, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STEVE DE SATNICK et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

March 20, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Mark Brifman for Defendants and Appellants.

Cochran & Pirtle and Bruce W. Cochran for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

ASHBY, J.

In this action on a promissory note, the court by nonjury trial gave judgment for plaintiff and respondent Akbar Kazerouni against defendants and appellants Steve and Mary De Satnick. The judgment further provides that appellants take nothing by their cross-complaint for breach of warranty.

Respondent sold his business (Photo Run Inc., a photo-developing store) to appellants for $310,000, taking back a promissory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases