HAMILTON v. RAFTOPOULOS


176 A.D.2d 916 (1991)

Howard Hamilton, Appellant, v. Dionisios Raftopoulos et al., Defendants, and Keith C. Apuzzo et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 28, 1991


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff contends that the Trial Judge improperly sustained the defendants' objection to the introduction into evidence of part of the examination before trial of the defendant Dr. Keith C. Apuzzo. Dr. Apuzzo, called as a witness on the plaintiff's behalf, was asked a question by the plaintiff's attorney with regard to an apparently prior inconsistent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases